Difference between revisions of "Recipe/Example/Dark chocolate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== Product == [https://nl.openfoodfacts.org/product/3046920028721/dark-absolute-lindt Link] Ingredients: Cacaomassa, magere cacaopoeder, cacaoboter, bruine suiker Nutrition...") |
|||
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Ingredients: Cacaomassa, magere cacaopoeder, cacaoboter, bruine suiker | Ingredients: Cacaomassa, magere cacaopoeder, cacaoboter, bruine suiker | ||
− | Nutrition: (51,31,8,1,NA,15,0.06) | + | Nutrition: (51,31,8,1,NA,15,0.06) (fiber not available) |
+ | |||
+ | == Ciqual == | ||
+ | Cocoa mass (from FDA) (54, 33, 5.5, 0.3, 0, 12, 0) | ||
+ | Cocoa powder, without sugar, powder, instant (18100) (20.6, 12.4, 11.6, 0.9, 29.5, 22.4, 0.11) | ||
+ | Cocoa butter (16030) (100, 59.7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) | ||
+ | Sugar, brown (31017) (0, 0, 97.3, 95.5, 0, 0.12, 0.1) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Result == | ||
+ | === NNLS forced order fit === | ||
+ | Deviance 0.01 (very good) | ||
+ | |||
+ | <gallery> | ||
+ | DarkChocolateRecipePredicted.png |Predicted recipe | ||
+ | DarkChocolatePredictedNutritionalValues.png |Predicted nutritional values | ||
+ | </gallery> | ||
+ | ==== Missing fiber estimate ==== | ||
+ | Now that we have an estimate for the recipe, we can estimate the amount of fiber. Only cocoa powder has fiber listed, with a fraction of 0.35 cocoa powder, we get 10.3 fiber. This seems pretty large. Why does this cocoa powder have such a large value? Others do not. Shouldn't the energy calculation not be off? | ||
+ | |||
+ | === John fit === | ||
+ | n this case the ingredients parser is incorrectly creating a cocoa solids ingredient with a 99% estimate because of the "Cocoa solids: 99% min" claim, whereas this total actually applies to the all of the ingredients, apart from the sugar. |
Latest revision as of 10:02, 13 February 2025
Product
Ingredients: Cacaomassa, magere cacaopoeder, cacaoboter, bruine suiker
Nutrition: (51,31,8,1,NA,15,0.06) (fiber not available)
Ciqual
Cocoa mass (from FDA) (54, 33, 5.5, 0.3, 0, 12, 0) Cocoa powder, without sugar, powder, instant (18100) (20.6, 12.4, 11.6, 0.9, 29.5, 22.4, 0.11) Cocoa butter (16030) (100, 59.7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) Sugar, brown (31017) (0, 0, 97.3, 95.5, 0, 0.12, 0.1)
Result
NNLS forced order fit
Deviance 0.01 (very good)
Missing fiber estimate
Now that we have an estimate for the recipe, we can estimate the amount of fiber. Only cocoa powder has fiber listed, with a fraction of 0.35 cocoa powder, we get 10.3 fiber. This seems pretty large. Why does this cocoa powder have such a large value? Others do not. Shouldn't the energy calculation not be off?
John fit
n this case the ingredients parser is incorrectly creating a cocoa solids ingredient with a 99% estimate because of the "Cocoa solids: 99% min" claim, whereas this total actually applies to the all of the ingredients, apart from the sugar.