Recipe/Example/Dark chocolate
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Product
Ingredients: Cacaomassa, magere cacaopoeder, cacaoboter, bruine suiker
Nutrition: (51,31,8,1,NA,15,0.06) (fiber not available)
Ciqual
Cocoa mass (from FDA) (54, 33, 5.5, 0.3, 0, 12, 0) Cocoa powder, without sugar, powder, instant (18100) (20.6, 12.4, 11.6, 0.9, 29.5, 22.4, 0.11) Cocoa butter (16030) (100, 59.7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) Sugar, brown (31017) (0, 0, 97.3, 95.5, 0, 0.12, 0.1)
Result
NNLS forced order fit
Deviance 0.01 (very good)
Missing fiber estimate
Now that we have an estimate for the recipe, we can estimate the amount of fiber. Only cocoa powder has fiber listed, with a fraction of 0.35 cocoa powder, we get 10.3 fiber. This seems pretty large. Why does this cocoa powder have such a large value? Others do not. Shouldn't the energy calculation not be off?
John fit
n this case the ingredients parser is incorrectly creating a cocoa solids ingredient with a 99% estimate because of the "Cocoa solids: 99% min" claim, whereas this total actually applies to the all of the ingredients, apart from the sugar.