Difference between revisions of "Brands"
(Overkill issue) |
|||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
== Questions / Issues == | == Questions / Issues == | ||
* company structure - do we want to list (and research) all the relationships between owners, marketing companies, etc. I would suggest that we do NOT and limit ourselves to the brands and brand owner (and maybe the production company); | * company structure - do we want to list (and research) all the relationships between owners, marketing companies, etc. I would suggest that we do NOT and limit ourselves to the brands and brand owner (and maybe the production company); | ||
− | * overkill - it is very tempting to add al kinds details for owners, etc. The actual owners of the product, brand, etc, do not seem useful to the consumer. We just should provide links to third parties for this kind information. | + | * overkill - it is very tempting to add al kinds details for owners, etc. The actual owners of the product, brand, etc, do not seem useful to the consumer. We just should provide links to third parties for this kind information. I.e. wikipedia, wikidata,, opencorporates, ipo europe, ... |
Revision as of 08:38, 24 April 2022
This is the brands of the product. The main brand, generally clearly displayed on the front pack, should be entered first. A product can have other brands:
- when a product is a brand sold by a big company:
Actimel
is sold byDanone
, see https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/4009700036810/actimel-granatapfel - when a product is sold with its brand translated in two languages:
Nature Valley
is sometimes writtenVal Nature
; see https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/0065633280267/barre-granola-erable-et-cassonade-nature-valleyNo Name
is also writtenSans nom
; represent 100+ products for No Name and 170+ products for Sans Nom.
When a product has more than one brand, the first brand in the field is taken as the main brand.
There's no taxonomy for brands for the moment, so just do your best and don't waste too much time to enter brands.
Data issues
Some brands are difficult to read:
- is it
Coop
,coop
,COOP
,CO OP
?
Some brands can be related to different companies in different countries:
Some brands are related to a common name or an ingredient, which can be confusing:
- Racines (means "roots" in French)
- La Truffe (means "the truffle" in French)
- Pure Protein
- Best Choice is a brand, not a tagline
- Great Value also
- The Belgian, often entered
Belgian
; it produces many false positive from our AI.
Brands containing an apostrophe are often missing this one:
Brands are changing sometimes. How to deal with that?
Some particular cases for a brand
- A brand can contain only numbers, such as
1664
,1883
or365
. - A brand can contain quotes, such as
The Muffin "Mam" Inc
- A brand can contain &, such as
M&M's
- A brand can contain commas, such as
Williams, West & Witt's Products
; https://world.openfoodfacts.org/brand/williams-west-witt-s-prods - A brand can have a sub-brand containing its own name:
Sainsbury's
use a brand calledBy Sainsbury's
.
Some particular cases for a product
- A product can have more than 2 brands; eg:
- Coop, in Switzerland, can add up to three brands on a product:
Betty Bossi
,Karma
andCoop
in this product; they justify it: "We offer a wide range of own-label brands and brand worlds." (source) - In this product,
Lipton
belongs toUnilever
but this product is distributed byPepsico
- Coop, in Switzerland, can add up to three brands on a product:
Implementation in Open Food Facts
In the database, this field is called brands
.
Preventing OFF AI to detect some false brands: see brand_taxonomy_blacklist.txt.
Help to collect brands
The IA of Open Food Facts, called Robotoff, is trying to identify brands. The annotations made by Robotoff are provided to users, asking them to answer to a simple question. There are also used by Hunger Game. Everyone can use Hunger Game, but be careful to the issues mentioned in this current page.
- on 2020-10-29, there were 43200 annotations and 22748 resting
- on 2020-11-17, there were 46911 annotations and 22720 resting
Taxonomy encoding
An overview of the encoding used in the brands taxonomy:
- blocks/white lines - a single brand is defined by a block of text and are separated by white lines;
- definition - a single line defines the brand in a specific language, an attribute, etc. Each line starts with a name followed by parameters and separated by a colon
- parameters:
- key (zz:) - required for brands with the same name
- language (e.g. en:) - the brand-name in the language en. A brand might be defined in multiple languages as needed, with a single line for each language
- default (xx:) - a value to be used for any language that is not listed;
- parent (<zz:) - a reference to another (parent) brands that encompasses the the brand. Can also be used for product lines. (are short and long names required?);
- attributes - to be defined
- owner
- country distributor
- wikipedia page
- local customer service address (one for each country where the product is distributed, and a generic one)
- order - start with the parent; follow by the key; the english value, the default, followed by the other languages in ISO-order
Example
zz:isolabio
xx:Isola Bio
website:en:https://www.isolabio.com/en/
production_company:en:Abafoods s.r.l.
brand_owner:en:ABAFOODS S.R.L. - Via Cà Mignola Nuova, 1775 - I-45021 Badia Polesine (Rovigo)
brand_owner_opencorporates:XX:not listed
- 106 products @2022-04-23
zz:latrappe
xx:La Trappe
website:nl:https://nl.latrappetrappist.com/nl/nl.html
brand_owner:en:Abdij O.L.V. van Koningshoeven - 3 Eindhovenseweg - NL-5056 RP BERKEL-ENSCHOT
brand_owner_opencorporates:BE:0838355558
production_company:nl:Bierbrouwerij De Koningshoeven NV
production_company_opencorporates:NL:18042956
wikidata:en:Q590921
- 11 products @2022-04-23
Questions / Issues
- company structure - do we want to list (and research) all the relationships between owners, marketing companies, etc. I would suggest that we do NOT and limit ourselves to the brands and brand owner (and maybe the production company);
- overkill - it is very tempting to add al kinds details for owners, etc. The actual owners of the product, brand, etc, do not seem useful to the consumer. We just should provide links to third parties for this kind information. I.e. wikipedia, wikidata,, opencorporates, ipo europe, ...