Difference between revisions of "Folksonomy/Property/packaging:has character"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Add "Property" template) |
(Test "DISPLAYTITLE" macro to see the underscore) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{DISPLAYTITLE|packaging:has_character}} | ||
| + | |||
Is there a film- or cartoon character on this product? <code>Yes</code> should be the main value. But <code>No</code> can be interesting to share. We might like to see if some products are loosing their character by the time. Lack of value doesn't mean it can't be yes or no, it's just unknown. | Is there a film- or cartoon character on this product? <code>Yes</code> should be the main value. But <code>No</code> can be interesting to share. We might like to see if some products are loosing their character by the time. Lack of value doesn't mean it can't be yes or no, it's just unknown. | ||
Revision as of 13:17, 15 September 2021
Is there a film- or cartoon character on this product? Yes should be the main value. But No can be interesting to share. We might like to see if some products are loosing their character by the time. Lack of value doesn't mean it can't be yes or no, it's just unknown.
Usage
packaging:has_character=yes
There is a character printed on the package of the product. The kind of character can be precised by two other properties:
packaging:has_character=no
It can make sense if the previous version was packaging:has_character=yes.