Line 5:
Line 5:
See [https://github.com/openfoodfacts/openfoodfacts-server/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+ingredients+label%3Abrands issues related to <code>brands</code>].
See [https://github.com/openfoodfacts/openfoodfacts-server/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+ingredients+label%3Abrands issues related to <code>brands</code>].
+
+
=== Suggested solution for the taxonomy ===
=== Suggested solution for the taxonomy ===
==== Short-term solution ====
==== Short-term solution ====
+
Make brands language-less
+
+
Iif a brand has a translated name, in some countries then we consider it to be a different brand (in a lot of cases the products sold under those translated names will be different).
+
+
For products that display the brand in only one language, we just record that brand, and we display it as-is.
+
+
+
==== Mid-term solution (to be defined/work in progress) ====
The taxonomy for brands should have following features:
The taxonomy for brands should have following features:
* a single brand is defined by a block of text and are separated by white lines;
* a single brand is defined by a block of text and are separated by white lines;
Line 48:
Line 58:
In this example, we put de_de as first language because Lidl is a German company. Nevertheless, it should work the same starting with different language, at the condition that children refers to the parent accordingly.
In this example, we put de_de as first language because Lidl is a German company. Nevertheless, it should work the same starting with different language, at the condition that children refers to the parent accordingly.
−
==== Mid-long-term solution (to be defined/work in progress) ====
+
==== Long-long-term solution (to be defined/work in progress) ====
Same as before, adding:
Same as before, adding: