Line 128: |
Line 128: |
| | | |
| == Conclusion == | | == Conclusion == |
− | The graph below shows the malus for each country based on population road-distance weighted transportation distance. The location of the circles is on the country centroid. | + | The graph below shows the size of each country based on population road-distance weighted transportation distance. The location of the circles is on the country centroid. |
| | | |
− | Some observations:
| + | So what to do with this data? The idea is to extend the ecoscore to other countries. A consistent approach should allow comparison between countries and favorise local production and consumption. |
− | * France and Italy have the largest size. In order to cover the entire population a large distance is required;
| |
− | * Department Bouches du Rhône has the smallest size of this set;
| |
− | | |
− | The sizes are however not very large compared to the 1500 km, so the country correction will be limited. All depends however how the correction ia applied on a European scale, which requires elucidation by Ecoscore. | |
− | | |
− | Say we use a bonus system (similar as Ecoscore), which preferred locally produced products, then small territory sizes will get a bonus of 15 points. For France, it will be a bonus of 10 points.
| |