Difference between revisions of "Eco-score transport - en"
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
If we have a CO<sub>2</sub> impact and percentage for transport, the two numbers can be combined. | If we have a CO<sub>2</sub> impact and percentage for transport, the two numbers can be combined. | ||
− | The Eco-score-model uses a mix of transport modes for each country as taken from the Eurostat report. Why use a mix of modes, when for the food products only one mode is relevant? | + | The Eco-score-model uses a mix of transport modes for each country as taken from the Eurostat report. Why use a mix of modes, when for the food products only one mode is relevant? The eco score document speaks of "marchandises" numbers. Is this the food part? |
From the Ademe via the Eco-score documentation (can not access Ademe data): | From the Ademe via the Eco-score documentation (can not access Ademe data): |
Revision as of 12:42, 13 January 2021
Introduction
Approach
The eco-score calculation adds a correction to the base Agribalyse data in order to correct for additional transport. This should correction should favor products, which are produced near to the consumer.
There are two transport corrections that can be taken into account:
- ingredient transport - transport of individual ingredients to the production location. Is this already accounted for in Agribalyse? Can it be finetuned?
- product transport - the impact of transport between production location and consumption location.
Transport modes
Goods can be transported via road, rail or waterways. The transport modes are described in Eurostat report (2009).
The goods we are interested in (related to food) fall in the following NST/R categories (table 4.6, p66):
- 0/1 - cereals;
- 0/2 - potatoes, other fresh/frozen fruits and vegetables;
- 1/6 - foodstuffs and animal fodder;
- 1/7 - oil seeds and oleaginous fruits and fats;
We assume that Agribalyse takes care of the environmental impact in producing consumer ready products. This implies we are not interested in the transport of bulk raw products.
NST/R category 1/6 will be the most important category. For this category the most important transport mode is the route (table 4.7, p67).
Transport routes
We should look at the environmental impact for transporting goods between the production location and the consumption location. If both locations are known we can use the road distance between the two locations to get a good indication.
If these locations are not known, we need to use an estimation based on the information that we do have. The more unformation we have, the better the estimate will be.
No info
Without any additional info, there is not much to estimate. We know that it will be on average half the circumference of the world and probably much less. And this will also imply that the product is transported by sea and/or air.
Purchase country
If we know the country where the product was bought, we can make two assumptions:
- product is also produced in the country;
- product will be consumed in the purchase country;
We can then take an average transportation route of half the size of the country. This will also imply a route by road.
Production country
If in addition to the purchase country, we also know the production country, we can determine the route between both countries. This might involve transport by road, air or sea. Which transport means is used will also depend on the product category.
As we do not know the exact location of production or consumption, we need to use the geographic center of a country as an approximation.
Actual Locations
If either the purchase (consumption) or production locations are known, we can perform a more detailed calculation based on the the two locations and/or geographical centers. Such a calculation will be a low estimate, as we do not take into account the actual distribution network (distribution centers, transport network, purchase places).
Transport environmental impact
The environmental impact of transport logistics is multifold: from the infrastructure itself to the usage of the infrastructure. Usage impact is not only CO2 emissions, but also small particles, replacement of vehicles, etc, etc. (wikipedia)
Agribalyse attempts to combine all impacts into a single number (pef). We need a similar number for transport logistics. And this number needs to be comparable to the Agribalyse umber, so that the two can be combined. Is any such data available?
The Agribalyse analysis lists the CO2 impact for each product category. This CO2 impact is 21.6% of the total impact (ref).
If we have a CO2 impact and percentage for transport, the two numbers can be combined.
The Eco-score-model uses a mix of transport modes for each country as taken from the Eurostat report. Why use a mix of modes, when for the food products only one mode is relevant? The eco score document speaks of "marchandises" numbers. Is this the food part?
From the Ademe via the Eco-score documentation (can not access Ademe data):
- Road 79 g eq./Tkm
- Maritime (Suez) 7 g eq. per tonne km
- Maritime (Atlantic) 11 g eq. per tonne km