Difference between revisions of "Recipe/ExampleMacqueraux"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
[[File:MackerelFitNutrients.png|400 px|thumb|center|Mackarel fit nutrients]] | [[File:MackerelFitNutrients.png|400 px|thumb|center|Mackarel fit nutrients]] | ||
Fit looks good, but the mackerel used has a bit more fat and less proteins. Carbs due to vegetables ok. | Fit looks good, but the mackerel used has a bit more fat and less proteins. Carbs due to vegetables ok. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Fiber estimate ==== | ||
+ | 0.23 (very low) | ||
=== John fit === | === John fit === | ||
This currently over-estimates the Mackerel and underestimates the vegetables. This may be because carbohydrates are currently being ignored (due to differences in reporting net and gross) and because fibre is not quoted, sugars are the only other carbohydrate involved, but they have relatively low quantities so don't influence the results significantly. Also including carbohydrates in the analysis, or increasing the weight of that sugar has on the variance, gives some improvement in the estimate. | This currently over-estimates the Mackerel and underestimates the vegetables. This may be because carbohydrates are currently being ignored (due to differences in reporting net and gross) and because fibre is not quoted, sugars are the only other carbohydrate involved, but they have relatively low quantities so don't influence the results significantly. Also including carbohydrates in the analysis, or increasing the weight of that sugar has on the variance, gives some improvement in the estimate. |
Latest revision as of 11:03, 13 February 2025
Product
nutrition: (11, 3, 0.8, 0.6, 13, 1)
ingredients:
Filets de maquereaux (60%), eau, carottes (5%), oignons (5%), vinaigre d'alcool, cornichons (cornichons, vinaigre d'alcool, sel) (dont sulfites) (1,7%), vinaigre de vin blanc, vin blanc (1%), sel, jus de citron concentré, poivre noir, laurier, thym.
Ciqual
Mackerel, raw (13.5, 3.22, 0, 0, 18.1, 0.16) no fiber
Carrot, raw (0, 0, 7.59, 6, 0.63, 0.11 ) fiber 2.7
Onion, raw (20034) (0.62, 0, 6.25, 4.8, 1.1, 0.098) fiber 1.7
Vinegar (11018) (0.1, 0, 0.62, 0.04, 0.04, 0.033) fiber 0
Gherkin, pickled in vinegar (11004) (0,0, 0.78, 0.6, 1.05, 1.72,0 ) fiber 1.5
Vinegar form red wine (11220) (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0.013) fiber 0
Wine, white, dry (5215) (0, 0, 4.04, 0.17, 0, 0, 0.0063) no fiber
Salt, white (sea, igneous or rock), no enrichment (11017) (0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 97.8) no fiber
Fit results
NNLS with forced order
Deviance 1.5 (above 1 warrants a second look
Fit looks good, but the mackerel used has a bit more fat and less proteins. Carbs due to vegetables ok.
Fiber estimate
0.23 (very low)
John fit
This currently over-estimates the Mackerel and underestimates the vegetables. This may be because carbohydrates are currently being ignored (due to differences in reporting net and gross) and because fibre is not quoted, sugars are the only other carbohydrate involved, but they have relatively low quantities so don't influence the results significantly. Also including carbohydrates in the analysis, or increasing the weight of that sugar has on the variance, gives some improvement in the estimate.