Difference between revisions of "Recipe/Example/Four Nut Mix"
(→Data) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Data == | == Data == | ||
+ | Four scenarios: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+ Four nuts product | |+ Four nuts product | ||
Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | The nutritional values for the Ciqual ingredients. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+ Ciqual ingredients | |+ Ciqual ingredients | ||
Line 44: | Line 46: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | The nutritional values based on the OFF category ingredients. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|+ OFF median ingredients | |+ OFF median ingredients |
Revision as of 15:10, 29 January 2025
Product
This product with four ingredients will be used to find the recipe. The ingredients states that 25% of each nut (walnut, hazel nut, cashew nut and almond) was used.
Data
Four scenarios:
Nutrient | Product | Ciqual Expected | Median Expected |
---|---|---|---|
Fat | 58.0 | 58.7 | 56.2 |
Sat. Fat | 6.4 | 5.95 | 5.78 |
Carbohydrates | 6.4 | 11.09 | 13.5 |
Sugars | 4.2 | 4.63 | 4.08 |
Fiber | 8.5 | 7.93 | 7.16 |
Proteins | 20.4 | 16.63 | 17.33 |
Salt | 0.01 | 0.042 | 0.006 |
The nutritional values for the Ciqual ingredients.
Nutrient | Walnuts | Hazelnuts | Cashews | Almonds |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fat | 67.3 | 66 | 49 | 52.5 |
Sat. Fat | 6.45 | 4.51 | 8.87 | 3.95 |
Carbohydrates | 6.88 | 5.21 | 23.5 | 8.76 |
Sugars | 3 | 4.26 | 6.63 | 4.63 |
Fiber | 6.7 | 9.4 | 5.7 | 9.9 |
Proteins | 13.3 | 14.4 | 17.4 | 21.4 |
Salt | 0.1 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.048 |
The nutritional values based on the OFF category ingredients.
Nutrient | Walnuts | Hazelnuts | Cashews | Almonds |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fat | 65 | 60 | 46.7 | 53 |
Sat. Fat | 6.1 | 4.1 | 8.93 | 4 |
Carbohydrates | 10.5 | 4.3 | 28.6 | 10 |
Sugars | 3 | 3.2 | 6 | 4.1 |
Fiber | 6.67 | 7.5 | 3.57 | 10.9 |
Proteins | 15.2 | 15 | 17.7 | 21.4 |
Salt | 0.01 | 0.002 | 0 | 0.01 |
Least squares fit
The table below present four fit results. This compares the Ciqual ingredients against the OFF median ingredients. And for the product itself and the calculated expected product.
The calculated results are pretty good.
The product results are way off. Negative values should not be allowed. Are the nutritional values of products so sensitive to the values of ingredients used? Or is this a big error in the product? The carbohydrates seem much too small. Increasing them to 10, will at least give positive values for the recipe, but nowhere near the expected results.
model | Walnuts | Hazelnuts | Cashews | Almonds |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ciqual | 0.88 | -0.69 | -0.19 | 1.01 |
Calculated+Ciqual | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
Median | -0.96 | 1.55 | 0.27 | 0.28 |
Calculated+Median | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.25 |