Difference between revisions of "Dashboard/Australia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The following conclusions can be drawn: | The following conclusions can be drawn: | ||
− | * Growth is small (0. | + | * Growth is small (0.6% or 249 products); |
* 80% of the products have no Nutriscore; | * 80% of the products have no Nutriscore; | ||
− | * Adding nutritional values from image is possible for | + | * Adding nutritional values from image is possible for 2423 products, which might result in a Nutriscore; |
* 84% of the products have no NOVA | * 84% of the products have no NOVA | ||
− | * Adding ingredients from image is possible for | + | * Adding ingredients from image is possible for 877 products, which might result in a NOVA-score; |
− | * data quality | + | * data quality decreased (-0.6% change) |
* Edit effort can keep up with growth; | * Edit effort can keep up with growth; | ||
− | [[File: | + | [[File:OFFdashboardAU24-02.png|frame|center|Dashboard Australia February 2024]] |
− | |||
[[Category:Australia]] | [[Category:Australia]] | ||
Revision as of 08:22, 13 February 2024
The following conclusions can be drawn:
- Growth is small (0.6% or 249 products);
- 80% of the products have no Nutriscore;
- Adding nutritional values from image is possible for 2423 products, which might result in a Nutriscore;
- 84% of the products have no NOVA
- Adding ingredients from image is possible for 877 products, which might result in a NOVA-score;
- data quality decreased (-0.6% change)
- Edit effort can keep up with growth;