Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ingredients ontology"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Could the NICE classification by the WIPO be useful for developing an interoperable ontology?) |
m (Aleene moved page Project talk:Ingredients ontology to Talk:Ingredients ontology) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Could [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_(Nice)_Classification_of_Goods_and_Services the NICE classification] by the WIPO be useful for developing an interoperable ontology? [https://www.wipo.int/classifications/nice/en/ Access NICE | + | Could [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_(Nice)_Classification_of_Goods_and_Services the NICE classification] by the WIPO be useful for developing an interoperable ontology? [https://www.wipo.int/classifications/nice/en/ Access NICE at WIPO.int] or [http://www.en.mktu.info/goods/ mktu.info]. EURONICE was a 13+ language NICE compliant database by the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM). In 2016 OHIM was named to European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). Surely the multilingual database didn't go to /dev/null, but just offline. [[User:Juho-of-consumerium-org|Juho-of-consumerium-org]] ([[User talk:Juho-of-consumerium-org|talk]]) 15:08, 22 August 2019 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 08:29, 23 October 2023
Could the NICE classification by the WIPO be useful for developing an interoperable ontology? Access NICE at WIPO.int or mktu.info. EURONICE was a 13+ language NICE compliant database by the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (OHIM). In 2016 OHIM was named to European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). Surely the multilingual database didn't go to /dev/null, but just offline. Juho-of-consumerium-org (talk) 15:08, 22 August 2019 (CEST)