Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 112: Line 112:  
|John G
 
|John G
 
|Ideas
 
|Ideas
|Linked to the above. How best to split things up, e.g. by the type of analysis like Eco, Ingredients, Categorisation, etc. or by "Product Type", e.g. Food-related analyses (including Eco, etc.), Beauty products analysis, Pet Food products analysis, etc. We could split it even further, e.g. eco for pet food, eco for beauty products, etc. but then we might have too many things to manage. We want the organisation of the code to match the organisation of the community as much as possible.
+
|Linked to rebuilding from the ground up. How best to split things up, e.g. by the type of analysis like Eco, Ingredients, Categorisation, etc. or by "Product Type", e.g. Food-related analyses (including Eco, etc.), Beauty products analysis, Pet Food products analysis, etc. We could split it even further, e.g. eco for pet food, eco for beauty products, etc. but then we might have too many things to manage. We want the organisation of the code to match the organisation of the community as much as possible.
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
7

edits

Navigation menu