984
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: − + − + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Add table to Nutri-Score issues
There are many reasons why it can differ:
There are many reasons why it can differ:
* the label in Open Food Facts does not represent the label printed on the package (easy to solve)
* the label in Open Food Facts does not represent the label printed on the package (easy to solve)
* the label is correct but our calculation doesn't provide the same result:
* the label is correct, but our calculation doesn't provide the same result:
** check the category,
** check the category,
** then check the nutrition facts: the issue is sometimes the lack of "fibers" information or the lack of "Fruits, vegetables, nuts and rapeseed, walnut and olive oils" percentage.
** then check the nutrition facts: the issue is sometimes the lack of "fibers" information or the lack of "Fruits, vegetables, nuts and rapeseed, walnut and olive oils" percentage.
* it can be a software issue (quite rare but possible)
* it can be a software issue (quite rare but possible).
{| class="wikitable"
|+
!Issue
!Rationale
!How to fix
|-
|The Nutri-Score displayed by the producer is different from the Nutri-Score Open Food Facts computes
|The label in Open Food Facts does not represent the label printed on the package
|Change the label
|-
|idem
|The category is wrong
|Change the category and see if it's modifying the Nutri-Score
|-
|idem
|The nutrition facts are wrong
|
* Update it
* If the product's nutrition facts has evolved from a previous version, you can add it to the [[Verification/Noteworthy Products#Products with a Nutri-Score that has improved over time|products whose recipe has changed]] or even better, if it's the case, the [[Verification/Noteworthy Products#Products with a Nutri-Score that has improved over time|products with a Nutri-Score that has improved over time]].
|}
=== Cleaning up the consequences of an old Android bug ===
=== Cleaning up the consequences of an old Android bug ===