22
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "==== Area Concerned: ==== * The database itself. * The website, wiki and other ressource available at http://openfoodfacts.org . * The presentations: Both the act and the ress..."
==== Area Concerned: ====
* The database itself.
* The website, wiki and other ressource available at http://openfoodfacts.org .
* The presentations: Both the act and the ressource.
* The mialing lists and email communications.
* The 3rd party communication tool such as slack, github, trello, twitter.
==== Example rules from other coc ====
===== OSM's case: =====
I found 2 different code of conduct.
Both have discussion suround them.
* Github [https://github.com/osmlab/codes-of-conduct/blob/master/mailing_lists/code_of_conduct.md code of conduct] and [https://github.com/osmlab/codes-of-conduct/issues/12 discussion]
* Wiki [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_Code_of_Conduct_%28Draft%29 code of conduct] and [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Community_Code_of_Conduct_%28Draft%29 discussion]
It is not enfored as far as I can tell.
The closest document to a CoC I could find is well hidden [http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Ban_Policy as a ban policy] text.
===== Wikipedia's case: =====
I found a failed attempt at doing a [http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_Code_of_Conduct CoC]
There is also a long [http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Administrator_Code_of_Conduct talk page ]
===== Fedora's case =====
They refer to their [https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct CoC] a lot in mailing list and other online communication tool.
It states to be a "guide to make it easier to be excellent to each other."
It is in use, but fail to deliver a way to report breach.
===== PyCon's case =====
[https://us.pycon.org/2013/about/code-of-conduct/ This CoC] is aimed at a phisical event, not online communication.
It feature both a attendee and staff procedure.
===== Contributor Covenant's case =====
This is a [http://contributor-covenant.org/ generic CoC] that we could reuse as is.
It aim to be a standart, the same way licence are standars (as far as I understand the project goal)
===== Ada Initiative's case =====
They are probably one of the [https://adainitiative.org/what-we-do/conference-policies/ driver behind conferences having policies]
They provide [http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-harassment_policy_resources ressources] and arguments for a code of conduct.
==== Historical account of behaviour on OFF ====
There might or might not have been behaviour where a code of conduct and a way to repport breach would be beneficial to resolve the issue at hand.
Since there isn't a way to repport breach of conduct, people possibly affected by a breach could have just keep it to themselves.
As far as historical bad behaviour on OFF, there isn't information available.
===== what information =====
* An inclusive statement
* A list of what we think is not allowed
* What happens when you break the code
* How to repport something that break the code
===== where =====
* On github repo
* On the website
* On the mailing list footer (link to)
==== consult the contributors ====
We should ask how people feel about adding a CoC.
We can ask them via:
* Ask our twitter follower
* Ask our facebook follower
* Ask as part of the survey
==== A meaningful and powerful but also simple and short CoC ====
A [https://lite5.framapad.org/p/OFF-CoC draft] of the CoC
* The database itself.
* The website, wiki and other ressource available at http://openfoodfacts.org .
* The presentations: Both the act and the ressource.
* The mialing lists and email communications.
* The 3rd party communication tool such as slack, github, trello, twitter.
==== Example rules from other coc ====
===== OSM's case: =====
I found 2 different code of conduct.
Both have discussion suround them.
* Github [https://github.com/osmlab/codes-of-conduct/blob/master/mailing_lists/code_of_conduct.md code of conduct] and [https://github.com/osmlab/codes-of-conduct/issues/12 discussion]
* Wiki [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_Code_of_Conduct_%28Draft%29 code of conduct] and [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Community_Code_of_Conduct_%28Draft%29 discussion]
It is not enfored as far as I can tell.
The closest document to a CoC I could find is well hidden [http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Ban_Policy as a ban policy] text.
===== Wikipedia's case: =====
I found a failed attempt at doing a [http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_Code_of_Conduct CoC]
There is also a long [http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Administrator_Code_of_Conduct talk page ]
===== Fedora's case =====
They refer to their [https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct CoC] a lot in mailing list and other online communication tool.
It states to be a "guide to make it easier to be excellent to each other."
It is in use, but fail to deliver a way to report breach.
===== PyCon's case =====
[https://us.pycon.org/2013/about/code-of-conduct/ This CoC] is aimed at a phisical event, not online communication.
It feature both a attendee and staff procedure.
===== Contributor Covenant's case =====
This is a [http://contributor-covenant.org/ generic CoC] that we could reuse as is.
It aim to be a standart, the same way licence are standars (as far as I understand the project goal)
===== Ada Initiative's case =====
They are probably one of the [https://adainitiative.org/what-we-do/conference-policies/ driver behind conferences having policies]
They provide [http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-harassment_policy_resources ressources] and arguments for a code of conduct.
==== Historical account of behaviour on OFF ====
There might or might not have been behaviour where a code of conduct and a way to repport breach would be beneficial to resolve the issue at hand.
Since there isn't a way to repport breach of conduct, people possibly affected by a breach could have just keep it to themselves.
As far as historical bad behaviour on OFF, there isn't information available.
===== what information =====
* An inclusive statement
* A list of what we think is not allowed
* What happens when you break the code
* How to repport something that break the code
===== where =====
* On github repo
* On the website
* On the mailing list footer (link to)
==== consult the contributors ====
We should ask how people feel about adding a CoC.
We can ask them via:
* Ask our twitter follower
* Ask our facebook follower
* Ask as part of the survey
==== A meaningful and powerful but also simple and short CoC ====
A [https://lite5.framapad.org/p/OFF-CoC draft] of the CoC