Line 247: |
Line 247: |
| == OFF interpretation == | | == OFF interpretation == |
| This section will describe how the Disk Of Five algorithm can be adapted to OFF. | | This section will describe how the Disk Of Five algorithm can be adapted to OFF. |
− | === OFF Algorithm === | + | === OFF DOF Algorithm === |
| OFF should follow the same algorithm as the Disk Of Five Algorithm: | | OFF should follow the same algorithm as the Disk Of Five Algorithm: |
| * ''assign OFF product category'' - each product should have a product category assigned, otherwise the DOF can not work; | | * ''assign OFF product category'' - each product should have a product category assigned, otherwise the DOF can not work; |
− | * ''map product category to DOF categories'' - each OFF category should correspond to a DOF category. As there are only a limited number of DOF categories, this can fail. The product is then unrecognised with respect to DOF. | + | * ''map product category to DOF categories'' - it is attempted to map the OFF category to a DOF category: |
| + | ** ''success'' - the OFF category correspond to an existing DOF category. We can continue the analysis: |
| + | *** ''assign DOF slice'' - determine in which slice the product belongs; |
| + | *** ''assign DOF sub-slice'' - determine the subslice of the product; |
| + | *** ''determine the level of the product'' - a product is either inside or outside DOF |
| + | **** ''inside?'' - continue with the inside analysis |
| + | ***** limit intake |
| + | ***** does not match nutritional rquirements |
| + | **** ''outside?'' |
| + | ** ''no success'' - each OFF category should correspond to a DOF category. As there are only a limited number of DOF categories, this can fail. The product is then unrecognised with respect to DOF. It should get the label '''unrecognised DOF category'''. |
| | | |
| == OFF Changes required == | | == OFF Changes required == |