Difference between revisions of "Open Food Facts and Science"

From Open Food Facts wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
 
* How to help mention Open Food Facts? For example, see [https://github.com/facebookresearch/poincare-embeddings the end of this page].
 
* How to help mention Open Food Facts? For example, see [https://github.com/facebookresearch/poincare-embeddings the end of this page].
 
* Create a DOI?
 
* Create a DOI?
 +
* Look at the other article to see how they cite the database
  
 
===Work In Progree===
 
===Work In Progree===
Line 22: Line 23:
 
* Some put OFF in citations : [https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/5/1303/htm#B36-nutrients-12-01303]
 
* Some put OFF in citations : [https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/5/1303/htm#B36-nutrients-12-01303]
  
If our objective is to have an easy way to follow the scientific article using OFF, it would be interesting to create a DOI, and propose an easy way to cite it by offering a way to download the ref in the main formats (here are those used by google scholar):  
+
If our objective is to have an easy way to follow the scientific article using OFF, it would be interesting to create a DOI, and propose an easy way to cite the database by offering a way to download the reference in one of the major formats (here are those proposed by google scholar):  
 
*BibTeX ([https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/BibTeX wikipedia page]) is a text to copy past
 
*BibTeX ([https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/BibTeX wikipedia page]) is a text to copy past
 
*EndNote [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EndNote wikipedia page]
 
*EndNote [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EndNote wikipedia page]
 
*RefMan [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reference_Manager wikipedia page] The software is not supported any more but the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIS_(file_format) .ris format] is still used, and proposed by nature when clicking on "cite this article"  
 
*RefMan [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reference_Manager wikipedia page] The software is not supported any more but the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIS_(file_format) .ris format] is still used, and proposed by nature when clicking on "cite this article"  
 
*RefWorks [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RefWorks wikipedia page]
 
*RefWorks [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RefWorks wikipedia page]

Revision as of 10:09, 9 October 2020

Open Food Facts do like to contribute to science.

What?

Who?

Dozens of researchers already know or use Open Food Facts data. See:

How?

TODO

  • How to help mention Open Food Facts? For example, see the end of this page.
  • Create a DOI?
  • Look at the other article to see how they cite the database

Work In Progree

  • Nature seems to implement a tool for exporting articles in a .ris format (that is readable by most of the citation software : ris on wikipedia)
  • Some articles cite OFF by giving the url in the article :[1], [2]
  • Some cite OFF by giving the name : [3]
  • Some put OFF in citations : [4]

If our objective is to have an easy way to follow the scientific article using OFF, it would be interesting to create a DOI, and propose an easy way to cite the database by offering a way to download the reference in one of the major formats (here are those proposed by google scholar):