Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
611 bytes added ,  14:38, 17 December 2020
Line 213: Line 213:     
=== Results ===
 
=== Results ===
Group sizes:
  −
* 100g : 94 products
  −
* 100ml: 235 products
  −
* serving: 636 products
     −
The first check of the results can be seen in the graph below. Both the fat percentage and the Energy (kcal) have been normalised.
+
==== Grouping results ====
 +
For making the three groups
 +
 
 +
This resulted in group sizes of:
 +
* for 100g : 94 products
 +
* for 100ml: 235 products
 +
* for serving: 636 products
 +
 
 +
==== Distributions ====
 +
We need to plot the same distributions as presented earlier, so that we can see if the corrections had any effect.
 +
 
 +
==== Correlations ====
 +
The US/Canadian nutritional tables often have an entry ''Energy from Fat''. So we would expect a correlation between energy and fat percentage. This is shown in the graph below. Both the fat percentage and the Energy (kcal) have been normalised.
 
[[File:OliveOilsEnergyKcalNormalised.png|thumb|center|Distribution of Fat percentage per Energy (kcal)  (17-dec-2020)]]
 
[[File:OliveOilsEnergyKcalNormalised.png|thumb|center|Distribution of Fat percentage per Energy (kcal)  (17-dec-2020)]]
 
The graphs shows the 100mg group as blue dots, the per serving group as green dots and the 100ml group as red dots.  
 
The graphs shows the 100mg group as blue dots, the per serving group as green dots and the 100ml group as red dots.  
Line 225: Line 233:     
The difference in fat percentage can be explained by differences in specific gravity.
 
The difference in fat percentage can be explained by differences in specific gravity.
 +
 +
There is also no correlation between the saturated fat content and the energy:
 +
[[File:OliveOilsSaturatedFatEnergyNormalised20201217.png|thumb|center|Correlation between energy and saturated fat percentage (17-dec-2020)]]
 +
==== Statistics =====
    
== OFF Conclusions and thoughts ==
 
== OFF Conclusions and thoughts ==
3,393

edits

Navigation menu