Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
96 bytes added ,  06:21, 17 December 2020
Line 188: Line 188:  
The ''per volumetric serving group'' is the easiest. We need to know the type of nutritional table that has been used to extract the data from. Unfortunately this is not registered, so we need to find a proxy for this.  
 
The ''per volumetric serving group'' is the easiest. We need to know the type of nutritional table that has been used to extract the data from. Unfortunately this is not registered, so we need to find a proxy for this.  
   −
We could use the serving size field for this: if it contains ml, it might be taken from a per serving nutritional table. I have seen exceptions however.
+
We could use the serving size field for this: if it contains ml, it might be taken from a per serving nutritional table. I have seen exceptions however. Unfortuately the web-interface does not allow me to search on that.
   −
A better proxy is the existence of the transfat field. If there is data in that field, it is most likely a US or Canadian style nutritional table. Again this not a guarantee as other countries mark transbfta as well.
+
A better proxy is the existence of the transfat field. If there is data in that field, it is most likely a US or Canadian style nutritional table. Again this not a guarantee as other countries mark transfat as well. This results in 724 products
    
=== Normalisation ===
 
=== Normalisation ===
3,393

edits

Navigation menu