Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
added Luxembourg to the list of countries which have bilingual products
Line 8: Line 8:  
** Bilingual products
 
** Bilingual products
 
*** Products where all the texts on the label are in two (or more) languages
 
*** Products where all the texts on the label are in two (or more) languages
*** Common in bilingual countries (Belgium, Canada...)
+
*** Common in bilingual countries (Belgium, Canada, Luxembourg, ...)
 
*** e.g. most Cora products have all the text in French and in Dutch: http://world.openfoodfacts.org/brand/cora
 
*** e.g. most Cora products have all the text in French and in Dutch: http://world.openfoodfacts.org/brand/cora
 
* Products with some information in multiple languages
 
* Products with some information in multiple languages
Line 99: Line 99:  
==== Taxonomize all or most multilingual tag fields ====
 
==== Taxonomize all or most multilingual tag fields ====
   −
* Packaging, origins of ingredients and purchase places are tag fields (they contain comma separated values) that are not yet taxonomized
+
* Packaging, origins of ingredients and purchase places are tag fields (they contain comma separated values) that are not yet taxonomized. (Origin of ingredients is a two part tag: ingredient+origin. How to keep them apart? --[[User:Aleene|Aleene]] ([[User talk:Aleene|talk]]) 19:05, 15 November 2015 (CET))
* The existing taxonomy system will take care of the mapping between different languages
+
* The existing taxonomy system will take care of the mapping between different languages (country and language specific labels? --[[User:Aleene|Aleene]] ([[User talk:Aleene|talk]]) 19:05, 15 November 2015 (CET))
 
* The taxonomies need to be created or completed
 
* The taxonomies need to be created or completed
 
* To be determined: what to do with brands?
 
* To be determined: what to do with brands?
Line 106: Line 106:  
*** But exceptions exist
 
*** But exceptions exist
 
** Could benefit from being taxonomized in order to have a hierarchy
 
** Could benefit from being taxonomized in order to have a hierarchy
 
+
** An Hierarchy could also help to normalize brands, i.e. remove errors --[[User:Aleene|Aleene]] ([[User talk:Aleene|talk]]) 19:05, 15 November 2015 (CET)
    
==== Selection/crop of images in more than one language ====
 
==== Selection/crop of images in more than one language ====
Line 121: Line 121:  
* Create new fields suffixed by _lang, with a hash
 
* Create new fields suffixed by _lang, with a hash
 
** "ingredients_text_lang":{"en":"Chocolate, milk", "fr":"Chocolat, lait"}
 
** "ingredients_text_lang":{"en":"Chocolate, milk", "fr":"Chocolat, lait"}
 +
** So multiple languages can be found in the same field. --[[User:Aleene|Aleene]] ([[User talk:Aleene|talk]]) 19:18, 15 November 2015 (CET)
 
* Create new languages field
 
* Create new languages field
 
** Hash that contains languages for which we have values for at least one field
 
** Hash that contains languages for which we have values for at least one field
 
** "languages":{"en":"1", "fr":"1"}
 
** "languages":{"en":"1", "fr":"1"}
 +
** What is the purpose of this field? --[[User:Aleene|Aleene]] ([[User talk:Aleene|talk]]) 19:18, 15 November 2015 (CET)
 +
Could there be conflicts between the ingredients_text qnd ingredients_text_lang fields? And how should these be resolved?
 +
Could the number of hashes in *_lang fields be different? Also different in content (i.e. "it" and "en" in one field and "fr" and "nl" in another field)
 +
--[[User:Aleene|Aleene]] ([[User talk:Aleene|talk]]) 19:18, 15 November 2015 (CET)
1

edit

Navigation menu