984
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 48:
Line 48: − - https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/3329757003735+ + + − - https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/3165437400001+ − - https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/3329757003957/+ − '''Solution or workaround:''' + − − Action: − −
Data quality issues which can't be fixed (view source)
Revision as of 21:24, 6 December 2022
, 21:24, 6 December 2022en:energy-value-in-kj-does-not-match-value-computed-from-other-nutrients & en:energy-value-in-kcal-does-not-match-value-computed-from-other-nutrients: solution.
Eg.:
Eg.:
* https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/3329757003735
* https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/3165437400001
* https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/3329757003957/
'''Solution or workaround:''' there is no solution. The producer did not mention that the products contains ingredients that should not be counted to compute the energy. For example, if a product is Stevia and contains 99g/100g of carbs, there should not be counted because stevia is not providing any energy.
Action:
Github issue: https://github.com/openfoodfacts/openfoodfacts-server/issues/7789
Github issue:
== en:energy-value-in-kj-does-not-match-value-computed-from-other-nutrients & en:energy-value-in-kcal-does-not-match-value-computed-from-other-nutrients ==
== en:energy-value-in-kj-does-not-match-value-computed-from-other-nutrients & en:energy-value-in-kcal-does-not-match-value-computed-from-other-nutrients ==