Line 21: |
Line 21: |
| | | |
| == Product read API == | | == Product read API == |
| + | |
| + | === call === |
| + | |
| + | === result json === |
| + | * The json seems to have two user groups: OFF itself and end users (apps). Can the json be split in two section that correspond to these groups as well? Not sure whether this is a good approach. |
| + | * The json can be more structured, so that it is more readible for a viewer, but also from an parsing interpreting point of view. I.e. everything that corresponds to packaging goes together. |
| + | * Improved field-names, which clearly reflect the origin or processing of the data. This should reduce the number of questions around field s and their interpretation. |
| | | |
| == Product write API == | | == Product write API == |