Difference between revisions of "✍️ Ingredients Spellcheck"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Modify guidelines) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== ⭐ Guidelines == | == ⭐ Guidelines == | ||
| − | The impact of the Ingredient-Spellcheck needs to be controlled to avoid altering contributions and/or add new errors to "healthy" ingredient names. From the different types of errors observed across products, we came up with these spellcheck guidelines: | + | The impact of the Ingredient-Spellcheck needs to be controlled to avoid altering contributions and/or add new errors to "healthy" ingredient names. The text needs to be kept as unchanged as possible. From the different types of errors observed across products, we came up with these spellcheck guidelines: |
| − | * Whitespaces between words and percentages shouldn't be corrected. | + | * Whitespaces between words and percentages shouldn't be corrected. |
| − | * If | + | ** Example: "salt 0,2 %" |
| − | * | + | * If a percentage is ambiguous, it shouldn't be corrected. |
| + | ** Examples: "15 0%" ; "396" | ||
| + | * A whitespace involving a percentage shouldn't be modified, except if the digit is stuck in the previous word. | ||
| + | ** Example: "cheese1.9%" → "cheese 1.9%" | ||
* Some ingredients are enclosed with `_`, such as `_milk_` or `_cacahuetes_`, to detect allergens. Should remain unchanged. However, in the case it is not an ingredient, such as `_Cacahuetes_ con cáscara tostado. _Trazas de frutos de cáscara_.`, it needs to be modified into `_Cacahuetes_ con cáscara tostado. Trazas de frutos de cáscara.`; | * Some ingredients are enclosed with `_`, such as `_milk_` or `_cacahuetes_`, to detect allergens. Should remain unchanged. However, in the case it is not an ingredient, such as `_Cacahuetes_ con cáscara tostado. _Trazas de frutos de cáscara_.`, it needs to be modified into `_Cacahuetes_ con cáscara tostado. Trazas de frutos de cáscara.`; | ||
* Some percentages were badly parsed by the OCR. Since we cannot be sure about what is the right value, it is preferable to keep it as it is. | * Some percentages were badly parsed by the OCR. Since we cannot be sure about what is the right value, it is preferable to keep it as it is. | ||
* Accents and other language specific punctuations: | * Accents and other language specific punctuations: | ||
* In Romanian, the characters ["ş" (351), "ţ" (355)] (ASCII id) should be retrieved by the Spellcheck when necessary, | * In Romanian, the characters ["ş" (351), "ţ" (355)] (ASCII id) should be retrieved by the Spellcheck when necessary, | ||
| − | * Uppercase letters | + | * Uppercase letters shouldn't be modified. |
| + | ** Examples: "ECOSSE" ; "ÉCOSSE" | ||
* If lowercase, accent should be added if missing. | * If lowercase, accent should be added if missing. | ||
| − | * | + | * '*' shouldn't be removed. |
| − | * Whitespaces shouldn't been modified except | + | ** Example: "Schweinefleisch*" |
| − | * | + | * Whitespaces shouldn't been modified, except in the following cases: |
| − | * Regarding uppercases and lowercases, since the spellcheck should modify at least as possible lists of ingredient, we don't modify uppercases or lowercases except for | + | ** when two words are stuck to each other. |
| − | * In French, the character | + | *** Example: "rizbrun" → "riz brun" |
| − | * Commas and other word separators (, -, .) should be added to distinct ingredients. ** | + | * Regarding uppercases and lowercases, since the spellcheck should modify at least as possible lists of ingredient, we don't modify uppercases or lowercases except for the following reasons: |
| − | * | + | ** after a period: "orange.trace de..." → "orange. Trace de..." |
| + | ** if it's a proper noun: "france" → "France" | ||
| + | * In French, the character "oe" or 'œ' should remain unchanged after correction. If it is missing, it should be replaced by default by 'œ'. | ||
| + | ** Examples: "œuf" ; "bœuf" | ||
| + | * Commas and other word separators (, -, .) should be added to distinct ingredients. | ||
| + | ** Example: "citric acid electrolytes (salt, magnesium and calcium chlorides, mono-potassion phosphate)" → "citric acid, electrolytes (salt, magnesium and calcium chlorides, mono-potassion phosphate)" | ||
| + | * We don't add a period or modify the existing punctuation at the end of the list of ingredients. | ||
| + | * A ':' should be added in the following cases: | ||
| + | ** it is missing between the additive category and the additive name | ||
| + | *** Example: "conservateur nitrite de sodium" → "conservateur: nitrite de sodium" | ||
Revision as of 10:03, 4 September 2024
Most ingredient lists are extracted from packaging images using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) techniques. However, due to factors such as poor image quality, product curvature, or light reflections, the OCR process may incorrectly recognize text characters.
These errors affect the Ingredients Extraction and Analysis process, impacting the overall quality of the database.
Recent advancements in Machine Learning, particularly with the development of Large Language Models, offer new opportunities to address this issue, where previous solutions have yielded limited success.
⭐ Guidelines
The impact of the Ingredient-Spellcheck needs to be controlled to avoid altering contributions and/or add new errors to "healthy" ingredient names. The text needs to be kept as unchanged as possible. From the different types of errors observed across products, we came up with these spellcheck guidelines:
- Whitespaces between words and percentages shouldn't be corrected.
- Example: "salt 0,2 %"
- If a percentage is ambiguous, it shouldn't be corrected.
- Examples: "15 0%" ; "396"
- A whitespace involving a percentage shouldn't be modified, except if the digit is stuck in the previous word.
- Example: "cheese1.9%" → "cheese 1.9%"
- Some ingredients are enclosed with `_`, such as `_milk_` or `_cacahuetes_`, to detect allergens. Should remain unchanged. However, in the case it is not an ingredient, such as `_Cacahuetes_ con cáscara tostado. _Trazas de frutos de cáscara_.`, it needs to be modified into `_Cacahuetes_ con cáscara tostado. Trazas de frutos de cáscara.`;
- Some percentages were badly parsed by the OCR. Since we cannot be sure about what is the right value, it is preferable to keep it as it is.
- Accents and other language specific punctuations:
- In Romanian, the characters ["ş" (351), "ţ" (355)] (ASCII id) should be retrieved by the Spellcheck when necessary,
- Uppercase letters shouldn't be modified.
- Examples: "ECOSSE" ; "ÉCOSSE"
- If lowercase, accent should be added if missing.
- '*' shouldn't be removed.
- Example: "Schweinefleisch*"
- Whitespaces shouldn't been modified, except in the following cases:
- when two words are stuck to each other.
- Example: "rizbrun" → "riz brun"
- when two words are stuck to each other.
- Regarding uppercases and lowercases, since the spellcheck should modify at least as possible lists of ingredient, we don't modify uppercases or lowercases except for the following reasons:
- after a period: "orange.trace de..." → "orange. Trace de..."
- if it's a proper noun: "france" → "France"
- In French, the character "oe" or 'œ' should remain unchanged after correction. If it is missing, it should be replaced by default by 'œ'.
- Examples: "œuf" ; "bœuf"
- Commas and other word separators (, -, .) should be added to distinct ingredients.
- Example: "citric acid electrolytes (salt, magnesium and calcium chlorides, mono-potassion phosphate)" → "citric acid, electrolytes (salt, magnesium and calcium chlorides, mono-potassion phosphate)"
- We don't add a period or modify the existing punctuation at the end of the list of ingredients.
- A ':' should be added in the following cases:
- it is missing between the additive category and the additive name
- Example: "conservateur nitrite de sodium" → "conservateur: nitrite de sodium"
- it is missing between the additive category and the additive name