Difference between revisions of "Nutrients handling in Open Food Facts"
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
== Possible improvements to make things (a bit) simpler == | == Possible improvements to make things (a bit) simpler == | ||
− | * In the API, rename the | + | * In the API, rename the <code>{nutrient-id}</code> fields (such as <code>energy-kj</code>, <code>saturated-fat</code>) to <code>{nutrient-id}_value</code>, so that it matches the name of the field stored. It also makes clearer where the value is coded. |
− | * Store the energy-kcal values in kcal, without converting them to kJ | + | * Store the <code>energy-kcal</code> values in kcal, without converting them to kJ |
** This is probably what people intuitively expect | ** This is probably what people intuitively expect | ||
** It removes unnecessary conversions from kcal to kJ and back (which is not trivial, as some people/apps may choose a different conversion factor, such as 4.2 or 4.185) | ** It removes unnecessary conversions from kcal to kJ and back (which is not trivial, as some people/apps may choose a different conversion factor, such as 4.2 or 4.185) | ||
** This would be a breaking change if some apps use the energy-kcal_100g/serving or energy-kj_100g/serving fields | ** This would be a breaking change if some apps use the energy-kcal_100g/serving or energy-kj_100g/serving fields | ||
+ | * Expose only the recommended fields (see [[Nutrients_handling_in_Open_Food_Facts#Data_display|data display]]) | ||
== Possible improvements to make things (a bit) more complex == | == Possible improvements to make things (a bit) more complex == |
Revision as of 10:33, 3 June 2020
Summary
This page describes how nutrients are stored in Open Food Facts and how they can be read or written through the API.
Why it's more complex that you might think
- Nutrients lists are different depending on countries
- Nutrients list are different depending on time (evolutions in the law)
- e.g. in 2013 in Europe, the main unit for energy became kJ instead of kcal, and salt replaced sodium, with salt = 2.5 x sodium
- Nutrients on labels may be in different units
- e.g. sodium could be listed in mg or in g
- US uses calories (kcal), EU uses kJ + kcal
- Nutrients may be specified per 100g, per 100ml (which may be different than per 100g), per serving, or both
- Nutrients may be specified for the product sold as-is, or prepared (with water, milk or something else), or both
- Some apps, producers, databases etc. may give us values in a specific unit which is not the one that is on the label
How it works
Data input
Fields sent to the write API
Apps (+ the OFF web site edit form) send:
nutrition_data_per
:100g
orserving
serving_size
: (optional, but very useful, in particular if the nutrition facts are specified per serving)- For each nutrient:
{nutrient-id}
(e.g.saturated-fat
,energy-kcal
): value for the nutrient, for the size specified in the fieldnutrition_data_per
. This is a string made of the modifier ("<", ">" or "") and the value without unit ("17.8", "34,7", "< 0.1", etc).{nutrient-id}_unit
(e.g. saturated-fat_unit, energy-kcal_unit): the unit of the value passed (e.g. "g", "mg", "kcal", "kJ", "%", "")
Notes about the energy fields:
- Energy on labels can be written in kcal, kJ or both
- When the energy is written in both, there is no universally defined conversion ratio between kcal and kJ.
- This is because labelling laws in EU, US, CA etc. specify that the energy fields can (or must) be computed by multiplying and summing values for carbohydrates, proteins, fat etc.
- That's why we now store 2 energy fields, and not just one
- See https://esha.com/calorie-calculation-country/ for details
energy-kj
andenergy-kcal
are the identifiers ({nutrient-id}
) of the "Energy in kJ" and "Energy in kcal" fields.- Old apps used to pass energy (as we had only one energy field instead of energy-kcal + energy-kj)
- For those apps, the
energy_unit
field is used to populate the correspondingenergy-kj
orenergy-kcal
field
- For those apps, the
Fields entered and computed by the OFF backend (Product Opener)
{nutrient-id}_value
: what was entered and passed in the nutrient-id field.{nutrient-id}_unit
: what was entered and passed in the nutrient-id_unit field.{nutrient-id}
: the value converted in the default unit (currently kJ for all energy fields (including energy-kcal), otherwise gram).{nutrient-id}_(100g|serving)
: is set to{nutrient-id}
(e.g. ifnutrition_data_per = 100g
, the value ofsugars_100g
is set to the value of sugars.- If the serving size is known, we compute the value for the other field (nutrient-id_100g or nutrient-id_serving) in default unit.
Data display
The OFF web site, and apps, should only use these OFF processed fields to display the nutrition data:
{nutrient-id}_100g
or{nutrient-id}_serving
(depending on the value of nutrition_data_per): value in g or in kJ. The values are passed as float/double???{nutrient-id}_value
: to show the original entered/passed data (useful for characters as "<" or "~").
The web site and apps must:
- Indicate if the nutrition facts are per 100g or per serving.
- Convert the value from g or kJ to the desired unit.
Notes:
- Don't use the
{nutrient-id}_value
and{nutrient-id}_unit
fields- The
{nutrient-id}
may be empty as some apps don't pass a unit, and we use a default unit for the field - The value may be per 100g or per serving
- The
Data edit
The web site and apps that allow editing the nutrition facts must populate the table with the same rules than for data display.
(What does this mean? only allow editing of the off processed field)???
Possible improvements to make things (a bit) simpler
- In the API, rename the
{nutrient-id}
fields (such asenergy-kj
,saturated-fat
) to{nutrient-id}_value
, so that it matches the name of the field stored. It also makes clearer where the value is coded. - Store the
energy-kcal
values in kcal, without converting them to kJ- This is probably what people intuitively expect
- It removes unnecessary conversions from kcal to kJ and back (which is not trivial, as some people/apps may choose a different conversion factor, such as 4.2 or 4.185)
- This would be a breaking change if some apps use the energy-kcal_100g/serving or energy-kj_100g/serving fields
- Expose only the recommended fields (see data display)
Possible improvements to make things (a bit) more complex
The current API does not allow to store values for the prepared product, but it can be done on the OFF web site.
We should extend the API to allow to write nutrition facts for the prepared product.
The fields for the prepared product are the same than for the as-sold product, except "_prepared" is appended to the nutrient-id.
e.g. saturated-fat_prepared_100g, saturated-fat_prepared_value etc.