Country correction

This page explores how the size of the country can be taken into account in the determination of the eco-score transport bonus.

Bonus approach

The eco-score approach intends to give a bonus to locally produced (and purchased) products. This bonus is +15, which is equal to a transport score of 100. This bonus is however now given to any product produced/purchased in France. No account has been taken of the very large size of France and impact of transport within the country.

Can this approach be adapted, so that the size of a country is taken into account?

Maximum bonus

It would be logic to give the maximum bonus (transport score if 100) only to very locally production and purchase. Ideally this will imply an area as small as possible, i.e. a city or very small country. Production and purchase that occurs in a country such as Andorra, Monaco, Liechtenstein or San Marino could be viewed as having a transportation score of 100.

No bonus

In the current calculation the no bonus (transportation score 0) is (arbitrarily) set at a distance of 2000 km. This distance covers roughly the size of Europe.

Centroids to the rescue

Is it possible to use the centroid calculations in determining the (transportation) size of a country?

The weighted sum for a country that consists of single city will be zero. This can then correspond to a transportation (bonus) score of 100. This means it is preferred to have no transportation.

The weighted sum of the major cities in the European Union (or larger area) could be used to define the transportation score of 0. This means a maximum transportation impact.

From Any weighted sum in between it is now possible to calculate a country transportation score. The larger the country, the lower the country transportation score. This country transportation score can be used to determine the maximum bonus for a country.

The centroid approach can also be used to calculate the country transportation size. We just have to add all cities, so that the entire population is covered. The resulting weighted distance is the size we are looking for.

In practice this approach is not feasible. It is just to much work to (to do by hand a least). So we need a way to get a reasonable approximation. For the calculation of the centroids a limited number of cities are used. We could try to extrapolate this data to get the transportation country size.

Approach

In the figure the results for Maroc are shown.

The population road-distance weighted transportation size of Maroc

The cumulative population weighted distances are plotted against the cumulative population ratios. Each added city adds a point, increasing the cumulative population ratio and the cumulative distance. If the cumulative population ratio is 1, we have covered the entire population. And the corresponding cumulative distance is the value we are looking for.

Instead of adding all the cities, we could fit a line to the data of a few city points. The cumulative distance of the fit at a population ratio of 1, is then again the value we are looking for.

The function to fit must behave nicely with extrapolations. This excludes complex functions with many parameters. Or functions which behave not regular outside the fitted points (polynomials).

This leaves the following functions:

• linear - results in average values;
• logarithmic - results in smaller values;
• power functions - results in larger values;

In the graph for Maroc a logarithmic function is used. The largest cities are not used in the fit calculation, as these ones seem not to follow the curve. They would bias the fit to much, when we use so few points. The fit will result in a transportation size of 419 km. Compare this to a maximum actual distance of about 1000 km.

Result

This approach has been applied on the following countries with a linear function:

Country	Centroid city	size	spreadsheet
Albania	Tirana	100	link
Algeria	Algers	370	link
Austria	Vienna	230	link
Belgium	Brussels	86	link
Bosnia and Herzegovina	Zenica		link
Croatia	Zagreb	160	link
Czech Republic	Prague		link
Denmark	Copenhagen	170	link
Estonia	Tallinn	120	link
Finland	Helsinki		link
France	Paris	430	link
Germany	Hannover	260	link
Greece	Athens		link
Hungary	Budapest		link
Iceland	Reykjavik	87	link
Ireland	Dublin	88	link
Italy	Rome	520	link
Latvia	Riga	77	link
Lithuania	Kaunas	120	link
Montenegro	Bijelo Polje		link
Morocco	Temara	230	link
Netherlands	Utrecht	72	link
Norway	Skien	300	link
Poland	Łódź	140	link
Portugal	Lisboa	140	link
Romania	Bucharest	300	link
Slovakia	Banská Bystrica	78	link
Slovenia	Ljubljana	66	link
Spain	Madrid	430	link
Sweden	Nörrköping	270	link
Switzerland	Olten	120	link
Tunisia	Tunis		link
United Kingdom	Coventry	210	link
European Union	Munich		link
Bouches du Rhône	Marseille	22	link

Comments

Some observations on individual countries.

• Iceland - the weighted distance graph contains several steps, due to the addition of cities far from the centroid. This introduces strange fits, if we use all cities So only the 9 (of 20) smaller cities have been used in the fit;

Conclusion

The graph below shows the malus for each country based on population road-distance weighted transportation distance. The location of the circles is on the country centroid.

Some observations:

• France and Italy have the largest size. In order to cover the entire population a large distance is required;
• Department Bouches du Rhône has the smallest size of this set;

The sizes are however not very large compared to the 1500 km, so the country correction will be limited. All depends however how the correction ia applied on a European scale, which requires elucidation by Ecoscore.

Say we use a bonus system (similar as Ecoscore), which preferred locally produced products, then small territory sizes will get a bonus of 15 points. For France, it will be a bonus of 10 points.