Difference between revisions of "Open Food Facts and Science"

From Open Food Facts wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 
== 🎯 Roadmap ==
 
== 🎯 Roadmap ==
 +
=== Better track usage ===
 +
=== Support new usages ===
 +
=== Document best practises ===
 +
 +
 
* How to help mention Open Food Facts? For example, see [https://github.com/facebookresearch/poincare-embeddings the end of this page].
 
* How to help mention Open Food Facts? For example, see [https://github.com/facebookresearch/poincare-embeddings the end of this page].
 
* Create a DOI? DOIs seem to be attached to fixed datasets and not databases. See:
 
* Create a DOI? DOIs seem to be attached to fixed datasets and not databases. See:

Revision as of 08:14, 28 August 2024

Science.png.png


Open Food Facts supports science.

I published a scientific work based on Open Food Facts

What?

Who?

Dozens of researchers already know or use Open Food Facts data. See:

How?

🎯 Roadmap

Better track usage

Support new usages

Document best practises

Work In Progress

  • Nature seems to implement a tool for exporting articles in a .ris format (that is readable by most of the citation software : ris on wikipedia)
  • Some articles cite OFF by giving the url in the article :[1], [2]
  • Some cite OFF by giving the name : [3]
  • Some put OFF in citations : [4]

If our objective is to have an easy way to follow the scientific article using OFF, it would be interesting to create a DOI, and propose an easy way to cite the database by offering a way to download the reference in one of the major formats (here are those proposed by google scholar):