Difference between revisions of "Open Food Facts and Science"

From Open Food Facts wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 33: Line 33:
 
*RefMan [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reference_Manager wikipedia page] The software is not supported any more but the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIS_(file_format) .ris format] is still used, and proposed by nature when clicking on "cite this article"  
 
*RefMan [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reference_Manager wikipedia page] The software is not supported any more but the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIS_(file_format) .ris format] is still used, and proposed by nature when clicking on "cite this article"  
 
*RefWorks [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RefWorks wikipedia page]
 
*RefWorks [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RefWorks wikipedia page]
 +
 +
[[Category:Project]]
 +
[[Category:Science]]

Revision as of 07:59, 28 August 2024

Science.png.png


Open Food Facts supports science.

What?

Who?

Dozens of researchers already know or use Open Food Facts data. See:

How?

TODO

Work In Progress

  • Nature seems to implement a tool for exporting articles in a .ris format (that is readable by most of the citation software : ris on wikipedia)
  • Some articles cite OFF by giving the url in the article :[1], [2]
  • Some cite OFF by giving the name : [3]
  • Some put OFF in citations : [4]

If our objective is to have an easy way to follow the scientific article using OFF, it would be interesting to create a DOI, and propose an easy way to cite the database by offering a way to download the reference in one of the major formats (here are those proposed by google scholar):