Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
107 bytes added ,  11:26, 13 December 2020
Line 29: Line 29:  
[[File:D00F953F-3266-414D-B11C-D61B39DEB2DA.jpg|thumb]]
 
[[File:D00F953F-3266-414D-B11C-D61B39DEB2DA.jpg|thumb]]
 
There are 6 products with more than 100% fat, so lets correct those first. It easier to list those with a [https://world.openfoodfacts.org/cgi/search.pl?action=process&tagtype_0=categories&tag_contains_0=contains&tag_0=olive%20oils&nutriment_0=fat&nutriment_compare_0=gt&nutriment_value_0=100&sort_by=unique_scans_n&page_size=20&axis_x=fat query] and correct them.
 
There are 6 products with more than 100% fat, so lets correct those first. It easier to list those with a [https://world.openfoodfacts.org/cgi/search.pl?action=process&tagtype_0=categories&tag_contains_0=contains&tag_0=olive%20oils&nutriment_0=fat&nutriment_compare_0=gt&nutriment_value_0=100&sort_by=unique_scans_n&page_size=20&axis_x=fat query] and correct them.
 +
    
For these products the wrong data has been added. One product had a fat content of 101g though.
 
For these products the wrong data has been added. One product had a fat content of 101g though.
   −
Now we can graph the fat content again:
+
 
 +
Now we can graph the fat content again. Now we see we have an issue with products with a fat percentage that is much to low. So next edit round.
 
[[File:6C4A12C1-47D0-4284-A8D6-427E3206B6C4.jpg|thumb]]
 
[[File:6C4A12C1-47D0-4284-A8D6-427E3206B6C4.jpg|thumb]]
3,393

edits

Navigation menu