Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
26 bytes removed ,  12:54, 16 December 2020
Line 86: Line 86:  
This seems more strange. You would expect that an oil consists of 100% fat, or maybe a bit less if there are impurities. The other peak lies around the 91%, very much like the specific gravity of 0.991.
 
This seems more strange. You would expect that an oil consists of 100% fat, or maybe a bit less if there are impurities. The other peak lies around the 91%, very much like the specific gravity of 0.991.
   −
Conclusion is that some producers report their nutritional values per 100g, some per 100ml and some use the canonical value of 100% (2193). A few product have values close to 100%, which seems most honest.
+
Conclusion is that some producers report their nutritional values per 100g, some per 100ml and some use the canonical value of 100% (2193 products). A few product have values close to 100%, which seems most honest.
    
If we have a look at the 100ml sample:
 
If we have a look at the 100ml sample:
 
[[File:OliveOils100mlFatDistribution20201216.jpg|thumb|center|Distribution of fat percentage smaller than 97% (16-dec-2020)]]
 
[[File:OliveOils100mlFatDistribution20201216.jpg|thumb|center|Distribution of fat percentage smaller than 97% (16-dec-2020)]]
Interestingly we have another distribution with two peaks. So where does the upper peak come from. Looking at the origin of the data, it looks like these products have nutritional values listed per serving. The canonical US value is 120 Cal.
+
Interestingly we have another distribution with two peaks. So where does the upper peak come from. Looking at the origin of the data, it looks like these products have nutritional values listed per serving.
    
=== Subcategories ===
 
=== Subcategories ===
3,393

edits

Navigation menu